Health Research Alliance
Browse
1-s2.0-S0261561421002144-main.pdf (692.89 kB)

Who would benefit most from postprandial lipid screening?

Download (692.89 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-01, 19:03 authored by Christina M Sciarrillo, Nicholas A Koemel, Bryant H. Keirns, Nile F. Banks, Emily RogersEmily Rogers, Sara K. Rosenkranz, Stephanie P. Kurti, Nathaniel D.M. Jenkins, Sam R. Emerson

Background & aims: Individuals with fasting triglycerides (TG) <150 mg/dL can experience a deleterious

postprandial TG response  220 mg/dL to a high-fat meal (HFM). The purpose of this study was to

identify individuals based on fasting TG that would benefit most from additional postprandial screening.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of 7 studies from our laboratories featuring 156 diseasefree

participants (64 M, 92 F; age 18e70 years; BMI 18.5e30 kg/m2). Participants observed a 10e12 h

overnight fast, after which they consumed an HFM (10e13 kcal/kg body mass; 61e64% kcal from fat).

Two methods were used to identify lower and upper fasting TG cut points. Method 1 identified the lower

limit as the TG concentration at which  90% of individuals presented peak postprandial TG

(PPTG) <220 mg/dL and the upper limit as the concentration which  90% of individuals presented PPTG

 220 mg/dL. Method 2 utilized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and identified the lower

limit as the fasting TG concentration where sensitivity was z95% and the upper limit as the concentration

at which specificity was z95%.

Results: In Method 1, 90% of individuals with fasting TG >130 mg/dL (>1.50 mmol/L) exhibited PPTG

 220 mg/dL ( 2.50 mmol/L), while 100% of individuals with fasting TG <66 mg/dL (0.75 mmol/L) had

PPTG that did not exceed 220 mg/dL (2.50 mmol/L). In Method 2, when sensitivity was z95%, the

corresponding fasting TG concentration was 70 mg/dL (0.79 mmol/L). When specificity was z95%, the

corresponding fasting TG concentration was 114 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L). Based on methods 1 and 2, there

was a moderate positive association (r ¼ 0.37, p < 0.004) between fasting and PPTG for individuals with

fasting TG between 70 and 130 mg/dL (0.79e1.50 mmol/L), in which 24% exhibited PPTG  220 mg/dL

( 2.50 mmol/L) while 76% did not.

Conclusions: Postprandial TG testing is likely most useful for individuals with fasting TG concentrations

between 70 and 130 mg/dL (0.79e1.50 mmol/L). Outside of this range, postprandial TG responses are

largely predictable. Establishing a specific patient group for which postprandial TG testing is most useful

may lead to earlier risk detection in these individuals.

History

Grant ID

18AIREA33960528

Usage metrics

    American Heart Association

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC